AI prediction receipts: every dated call, on the clock
The receipts, soonest due first
A receipt is simple: the exact public claim, the date it comes due, and a live clock. No editorializing — the stamps below are pure date math, and every claim links to its full sourced record. When a date passes, the receipt stays.
🚀 Elon Musk (xAI)
…“AGI by the end of 2026”
Deadline: Dec 31, 2026 · … · The boldest dated call on record. Hard deadline. · the full record →
🧭 Dario Amodei (Anthropic)
…““Powerful AI” possibly 2026–27”
Deadline: Dec 31, 2027 · … · Stated with explicit uncertainty; window closes end of 2027. · the full record →
⏱️ Leopold Aschenbrenner
…“AGI by 2027 (Situational Awareness)”
Deadline: Jan 1, 2028 · … · The thesis this site grades line by line — Tracker at 62.5/100. · the full record →
📊 Demis Hassabis (DeepMind)
…“~50% chance of AGI by 2030”
Deadline: Dec 31, 2030 · … · Probabilistic — graded at the date, not before. · the full record →
🤔 Metaculus community
…“50% by 2033”
Deadline: Dec 31, 2033 · … · Community median; moves with the news. · the full record →
🛡️ AI researcher survey (n=2,778)
…“50% by 2040”
Deadline: Dec 31, 2040 · … · The long-horizon academic base rate. · the full record →
Statuses update automatically: ON THE CLOCK (deadline ahead) → EXPIRES SOON (≤180 days) → DATE PASSED (deadline behind, claim unresolved on our scorecard). Probabilistic calls (“~50% by…”) are graded at their date, not before.
What the market is paying on these calls
A receipt records what someone said and when it comes due. A prediction market records what people will risk money on right now. Neither is proof — but a claim trading in the single digits while its deadline closes in is a receipt worth watching.
Odds are fetched by your browser from Polymarket and shown verbatim — we never cache or estimate them. We have no affiliation with Polymarket, take no fees, and nothing here is a solicitation to trade. Our own reading stays the Thesis Tracker (62.5/100), an editorial composite of graded verdicts, not a probability.
Why keep receipts?
Because timelines are the one thing AI discourse never gets held to. Public figures make dated calls; the dates pass; the conversation moves on. This page doesn't. It pairs each claim with the same evidence base our scorecard uses — the AGI-2027 Thesis Tracker (62.5/100 as of July 2026) grades the nearest big claim against benchmarks, compute and capex, and moves only when a verdict changes. See also the full forecaster leaderboard ranked by boldness.
Frequently asked questions
Elon Musk's — he has said AGI arrives by the end of 2026, the boldest dated call on record. That receipt comes due December 31, 2026. Dario Amodei's 'powerful AI possibly 2026–27' window closes a year later, and Leopold Aschenbrenner's AGI-2027 thesis resolves January 1, 2028.
The receipt stays and the stamp flips to DATE PASSED — pure date math against the claim's own deadline. Whether the claim was fulfilled is graded separately on the scorecard; as of July 2026 no system has met the AGI bar, and the AGI-2027 Thesis Tracker reads 62.5/100.
Every claim is a documented public position — each receipt links to a full sourced record on this site, and the machine-readable dataset (data.json, CC BY 4.0) carries the primary sources. Nothing is invented; probabilistic forecasts are labeled and graded at their date, not before.
The live scorecard updates as models ship and verdicts change.
View the live scorecard →Where do YOUR bets land? Play The Future Bet.
Bet on 12 bold futures in 60 seconds →Get told the moment a receipt comes due
One email when a dated call expires or a verdict flips. Free — no hype, just the record.
Subscribe free →